Skip to content
LIVE Jun 30, 2026 F&G 15 Predictions Markets Newsletter
EN ESsoon FRsoon DEsoon PTsoon
Markets
EXPLAINER
Memecoins

What Memecoins Actually Are: A Clear-Eyed Explainer

Memecoins are a specific category of cryptocurrency with no claim to utility, yield, or fundamental value. That sounds like a disqualification, but understanding what they actually are — and why that category has persisted and grown — requires looking past the dismissal and at the mechanics. Note: This explainer describes an asset category with extreme … Continued

Key takeaways

  • Most definitions of “memecoin” are negative: it is a cryptocurrency that does not have a whitepaper describing utility, or does not have an identifiable development team pursuing a technical roadmap, or was launched as a joke.
  • Dogecoin launched in December 2013 as an explicit parody of the cryptocurrency speculation culture that had developed around Bitcoin.
  • Most memecoins are straightforward ERC-20 tokens (on Ethereum) or SPL tokens (on Solana) or BEP-20 tokens (on BNB Chain).
  • Dogecoin and Shiba Inu are anomalies in the memecoin landscape.
  • Memecoins are the highest-risk segment of an already high-risk asset class.
Not financial advice. This article discusses prices and model-based scenarios for information and education only. Crypto is volatile and you can lose money. Do your own research and read our disclaimer.

Memecoins are a specific category of cryptocurrency with no claim to utility, yield, or fundamental value. That sounds like a disqualification, but understanding what they actually are — and why that category has persisted and grown — requires looking past the dismissal and at the mechanics.

Note: This explainer describes an asset category with extreme volatility and high risk of total loss. It is not financial advice or an endorsement of any specific token.

The Definition Problem

Most definitions of “memecoin” are negative: it is a cryptocurrency that does not have a whitepaper describing utility, or does not have an identifiable development team pursuing a technical roadmap, or was launched as a joke. These definitions are accurate but incomplete, because they describe what memecoins lack rather than what they are.

A more precise definition: a memecoin is a cryptocurrency whose value proposition is cultural rather than functional. It represents participation in a shared joke, reference, or community, and its price is entirely a function of that community’s size and enthusiasm. The token itself performs no computation, processes no transactions in any meaningful sense, and earns no revenue. Holding it is a statement of affiliation rather than an investment in economic activity.

This definition is more useful because it explains both what memecoins can and cannot do. They can generate price appreciation when community enthusiasm grows and attracts new participants. They cannot generate value independent of attention because there is no independent value-generating mechanism to reference. This is not a flaw in any specific memecoin — it is the structural definition of the category.

Where They Came From

Dogecoin launched in December 2013 as an explicit parody of the cryptocurrency speculation culture that had developed around Bitcoin. Its founders, Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer, intended it to be absurd — a demonstration that anything could be tokenised and that the speculative enthusiasm around crypto was partly irrational. They did not expect it to persist.

It persisted, and the reasons are instructive. Dogecoin’s community developed genuine shared culture: the Shiba Inu mascot, the “to the moon” language, the regular charity fundraisers that gave the community positive social meaning beyond speculation. This culture created retention — people stayed not because they expected financial returns but because they enjoyed the community. The community’s continued existence kept the asset from going to zero.

Shiba Inu launched in August 2020, explicitly billing itself as the “Dogecoin killer.” It replicated the aesthetic of Dogecoin (the Shiba Inu dog breed) while adding ERC-20 token mechanics that allowed it to be listed on decentralised exchanges and later major centralised exchanges. It eventually developed a roadmap including a Shibarium layer-2 network — an attempt to add utility to a memecoin, which creates interesting definitional problems.

The 2021 cycle brought thousands of animal-themed tokens. The 2024-2026 cycle shifted toward political and cultural figure tokens, AI-themed tokens, and tokens representing viral moments or inside jokes from specific internet communities. The form has evolved, but the structure remains the same.

How They Work, Technically

Most memecoins are straightforward ERC-20 tokens (on Ethereum) or SPL tokens (on Solana) or BEP-20 tokens (on BNB Chain). The standard token contracts take a developer less than an hour to deploy. There is nothing technically novel about most memecoin contracts — they implement the same transfer and approval functions as any other fungible token.

What creates the memecoin market is the combination of this technical simplicity with liquidity infrastructure. Platforms like Uniswap on Ethereum and Raydium on Solana allow any token to be immediately tradeable against ETH or SOL without permission from an exchange. A developer can launch a token, add initial liquidity, and have a live market in under ten minutes. This accessibility is what enabled the volume of memecoin launches seen in 2024-2025, where thousands of new tokens launched every day.

The price of a memecoin in an AMM pool is determined by the ratio of the two assets in the pool. If there is $10,000 of SOL and 1 billion tokens in a pool, each token is priced at $0.00001. When someone buys tokens with SOL, the SOL balance rises and the token balance falls, so the price per token rises. This mechanism creates the sharp price curves seen in early memecoin trading — a relatively small amount of buying capital can move a low-liquidity token’s price dramatically.

The Big Ones: Doge, SHIB, and Why They Survived

Dogecoin and Shiba Inu are anomalies in the memecoin landscape. Most memecoins launched since 2021 have lost essentially all of their value. Dogecoin has maintained a market capitalisation in the billions for years. Understanding the difference between them and the 99.9% of memecoins that did not persist is more useful than categorically dismissing or endorsing the asset class.

Dogecoin’s persistence comes from its usd/" class="twl-coinlink">first-mover cultural status, its proof-of-work blockchain (which gives it more technical substrate than most memecoins), its integration with mainstream payment acceptance at a small number of merchants, and its periodic attention from Elon Musk, who has mentioned it positively on multiple occasions. None of these factors are reliably reproducible by a new project.

Shiba Inu has evolved beyond pure memecoin status through Shibarium (its layer-2), ShibaSwap (its DEX), and a stated roadmap for expanding utility. Whether this evolution represents genuine value creation or an attempt to maintain attention through announced development is a question that on-chain data can partially answer — Shibarium’s actual transaction volume and user counts are visible on-chain, and independent analysts have provided assessments. See our Shiba Inu coin page for live data.

The Honest Risk Assessment

Memecoins are the highest-risk segment of an already high-risk asset class. The specific risks are:

Total loss risk: Unlike a company stock, where bankruptcy proceedings sometimes result in residual value for shareholders, a memecoin that loses community interest simply goes to zero. There are no assets to liquidate, no creditors to negotiate with, no restructuring possible.

Liquidity risk: A memecoin with a nominally large market cap may have very little actual liquidity — meaning that selling a meaningful position will move the price significantly against the seller. This problem is larger for tokens that have achieved the attention spike but not deep, sustained liquidity.

Information asymmetry: Early participants and insiders often know more about the launch mechanics, supply distribution, and planned promotion than buyers in the open market. This asymmetry systematically disadvantages later entrants.

Fraud risk: A meaningful proportion of memecoin launches involve deliberate exit scams. Our dedicated article on memecoin rug pulls and liquidity risk covers the mechanics in detail. The practical implication is that memecoin participation requires verification steps — checking contract audits, liquidity locks, and supply concentration — that most retail participants do not take.

Why They Persist Despite All This

Memecoins persist because they serve real functions even within an honest risk assessment. They provide accessible, low-barrier entry into crypto market participation — a $50 purchase of a memecoin is how many people first learn about wallets, gas fees, and on-chain mechanics. That education has value beyond the speculative outcome.

They also provide genuine community and entertainment value. The Dogecoin community’s charity work, the creative culture around meme generation, and the social dynamics of participating in a shared inside joke are real experiences that participants value regardless of price outcomes. Markets that serve social and entertainment functions alongside speculative ones are harder to dismiss categorically.

And for a small number of participants, they provide meaningful financial returns — not because the underlying economics are sound, but because speculative markets reliably transfer wealth from late, uninformed participants to early, informed ones, and some participants consistently occupy the early position.

None of this changes the fundamental risk profile for a typical retail participant entering during or after an attention spike. It explains why the category exists and why it will likely continue to exist. For broader crypto market context, visit our analysis section or our learn hub.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dogecoin a memecoin?

Yes, by origin and by structure. Dogecoin has no claim to utility beyond being a transferable currency, and its cultural identity as a meme is central to its persistence. Its age and proof-of-work infrastructure make it unusual among memecoins but do not change its fundamental category.

Can a memecoin develop real utility?

Projects have attempted this — Shiba Inu’s Shibarium is the most prominent example. Whether these efforts constitute genuine utility or attention-maintenance strategies is an empirical question that on-chain data can partially answer. Adding a roadmap does not change the speculative nature of holding the token unless the utility generates real economic activity that requires the token.

Are memecoins regulated?

The regulatory treatment of memecoins varies by jurisdiction and is evolving. In the EU, MiCA creates some requirements for crypto-asset issuers. In the US, most memecoins are not registered securities, but promotional activities can constitute securities fraud or market manipulation. See our regulation section for current developments.

Sources

  • Uniswap Foundation — AMM documentation
  • Coinmarketcap historical data — Dogecoin launch and price history
  • Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer original Dogecoin announcement (2013)
  • Shibarium network documentation — shibariumtech.com
General information only — not investment advice. TheWeal is an independent crypto data and education publisher. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Crypto carries risk, including the possible loss of principal. Read our disclaimer and editorial guidelines.
Written by James Okafor

CONFIRM WITH AUTHOR — James Okafor is the founding Editor-in-Chief of TheWeal, where he sets editorial standards across crypto news, live-market data and the publication's price-prediction work. He has reported on financial markets since 2009, beginning on the equities desk before moving full-time into digital assets in 2016 as institutional money first entered the space. James has overseen coverage of every major market cycle since — from the 2017 retail mania and the 2018 winter through DeFi summer, the 2021 highs and the deleveraging that followed. His editorial philosophy is unfashionably simple: explain what is actually happening, show the reader the data behind it, and never dress up a guess as a fact. Based in London, he is responsible for the never-list that governs what TheWeal will and will not publish, for the corrections process, and for the human review that sits behind every model-based prediction the site produces. He is accountable for everything that carries the TheWeal masthead. James reads every reader correction personally and considers a published mistake, promptly and visibly fixed, more trustworthy than one quietly buried.

More from James Okafor →